super slicer dynamic acceleration control

#Super slicer dynamic acceleration control full#

When enabled it prints slower and prints have more globby corners because it takes longer to slow down and overextrusion can be quite prominent on the corners.

I usually print at 35mm/sec (ALL 6 or so printing speeds) and 0.2mm layers and the parts are both accurate and gorgeous and just as fast as 100mm/sec (primary speed) at 0.1mm layers.Ģ) Disable jerk control and acceleration control. Here are the steps I do to improve dimensional accuracy over default profiles:ġ) Set all printing speeds to be the same - anytime you speed up or slow down you over/under extrude briefly. I think UM should come out with an 'engineering' profile that prints with higher dimensional accuracy. Nylon is difficult to print and you shouldn't compare the S5 with nylon versus the prusa i3 with PLA.īut overall I agree with most of your comments. However, I expected much more from the combination of HW/SW/Materials coming from a single manufacturer. Sorry if I seem to be quite negative, I really like the S5 for its flexibility and general reliability, as well as the very useful material range. On the other hand, they don't even seem to bother about simply ticking a box that is already there, like disabling the combing for CPE.

#Super slicer dynamic acceleration control full#

In other words, they are in full control of all the parameters.Ī turn-key 'print the STL file exactly as it is' solution would be a huge differentiator, especially for industrial customers

This should not be too difficult for Ultimaker, as they have in-depth knowledge of their materials, hardware and software. In my opinion, this is a prime example of what *should* be corrected in a material/printer profile. Thanks for your feedback! Correction in CAD is far from ideal in our companys workflow unfortunately.įor now, I made the adjustments in CAD, and while there is still some error (seems to be non-linear?), the accuracy is OK for the intended use of the part. On the positive side, at least in Z direction the accuracy is good so far. If Ultimaker is serious about gaining industrial customers in the long term (and who else, apart from wealthy hobbyists, will pay ~6500€ for a FDM printer?), they really have to offer a solution that works without endless tinkering. When paying this amount of money for a machine, I expect much more, honestly - especially when seeing what quality for example a Prusa i3 for nearly 1/10 the price is capable of. this is not a viable long-term solution! Does anyone know if there is a way to fix this in Cura?Īlso, the default UM material profiles in Cura generally seem to be rather unrefined and crude, judging from my experience - see the recent thread on CPE issues. When compensating with negative 'horizontal expansion', the inner hole cuts into the wall in layer view at -0.35, so I have to compensate this in the CAD file.

For outer dimensions, the part is 0.3mm too big in X Y, for inner dimensions (hole in the XY plane) it is 0.7mm(!). I am printing a fairly basic part in Nylon, and the final dimensions are very inaccurate in X and Y directions.